Proposition- the central idea statement in a persuasive speech; a statement made advancing a judgment or opinion
Target Audience- the members of an audience the speaker most wants to persuade and who are likely to be receptive to persuasive messages
Persuasion- a symbolic process in which communicators try to convince other people to change their attitudes or behavior regarding an issue through the transmission of a message, in an atmosphere of free choice
Mental Dialogue- an imagined conversation the speaker has with a given audience in which the speaker tries to anticipate what questions, concerns, or issues the audience may have to the subject under discussion
Selective Exposure- the decision to expose ourselves to messages that we already agree with, rather than those that confront or challenge us
Cognitive Dissonance- a psychological phenomenon where people confronted with conflicting information or viewpoints reach a state of dissonance (generally the disagreement between conflicting thoughts and/or actions), which can be very uncomfortable, and results in actions to get rid of the dissonance and maintain consonance
Two-tailed Arguments- a persuasive technique in which a speaker brings up a counter-argument to their own topic and then directly refutes the claim
Ethos- the influence of speaker credentials and character in a speech; arguments based on credibility
Logos- logical and organized arguments and the credible evidence to support the arguments within a speech; arguments based on logic
Pathos- the use of emotions such as anger, joy, hate, desire for community, and love to persuade the audience of the rightness of a proposition; arguments based on emotion
Analogical Reasoning- drawing conclusions about an object or phenomenon based on its similarities to something else
Figurative Analogy- an analogy where the two things under comparison are not essentially the same
Literal Analogy- an analogy where the two things under comparison have sufficient or significant similarities to be compared fairly
Logical Fallacies- mistakes in reasoning; erroneous conclusions or statements made from poor inductive or deductive analyses
Inductive Reasoning- a type of reasoning in which examples or specific instances are used to supply strong evidence for (though not absolute proof of) the truth of the conclusion; the scientific method
Generalization- a form of inductive reasoning that draws conclusions based on recurring patterns or repeated observations
Causal Reasoning- a form of inductive reasoning that seeks to make cause-effect connections
Sign Reasoning- a form of inductive reasoning in which conclusions are drawn about phenomena based on events that precede or co-exist with (but not cause) a subsequent event
Analogical Reasoning- drawing conclusions about an object or phenomenon based on its similarities to something else
Deductive Reasoning- a type of reasoning in which a conclusion is based on the combination of multiple premises that are generally assumed to be true
Syllogism- a three-sentence argument composed of a major premise (a generalization or principle that is accepted as true), a minor premise (and example of the major premise), and a conclusion
Enthymeme- a syllogism with one of the premises missing
False Analogy- a fallacy where two things are compared that do not share enough (or key) similarities to be compared fairly
False Cause- a general fallacy involving causal reasoning, where it is assumed that something that is neither strong or direct enough has caused something else, or something that happened first in time caused something later
Slippery Slope- a fallacy that assumes that taking a first step will lead to subsequent events that cannot be prevented
Hasty Generalization- a fallacy that involves making a generalization with too few examples
Straw Man- a fallacy that shows only the weaker side of an opponent’s argument in order to more easily tear it down
Post hoc ergo propter hoc (historical fallacy)- using progression in time as the reason for causation, but nothing else
Argument from Silence- making a converse argument from lack of evidence or information about a conclusion
Non Sequitur- a fallacy where the conclusion does not follow from its premise
False Dilemma- a fallacy that forces listeners to choose between two alternatives when more than two alternatives exist
Appeal to Tradition- arguing that traditional practice and longterm history is the only reason for continuing a policy
Bandwagon- a fallacy that assumes that because something is popular, it is therefore good, correct, or desirable
Red Herring- creating a diversion or introducing an irrelevant point to distract someone or get someone off the subject of the argument
Ad hominem- a fallacy that attacks the person rather than dealing with the real issue in dispute
Ad misericordium- inappropriate appeal to pity or emotions to hide lack of facts or argument
Presentation Aids- the resources beyond the speech itself that a speaker uses to enhance the message conveyed to the audience
Olfactory- of or relating to the sense of smell
Gustatory- of or relating to the sense of taste
Chart- graphical representation of data (often numerical) or a sketch representing an ordered process
Graph- a pictorial representation of the relationships of quantitative data using dots, lines, bars, pie slices, and the like
Line Graph- a graph designed to show trends over time
Bar Graph- a graph designed to show the differences between quantities
Pie Graph- a graph designed to show proportional relationships within sets of data
Pictograph- a graph using iconic symbols to dramatize differences in amounts
Diagrams- drawings or sketches that outline and explain the parts of an object, process, or phenomenon that cannot be readily seen
Tone- the attitude of a given artifact (humorous, serious, light-hearted, etc.)
Metro Campus Library: 918.595.7172 | Northeast Campus Library: 918.595.7501 | Southeast Campus Library: 918.595.7701 | West Campus Library: 918.595.8010
email: Library Website Help | MyTCC | © 2024 Tulsa Community College